As the midterm election campaign nears, the Supreme Court is deciding if legal limits on coordinated spending between parties and candidates violates the Constitution.

A campaign finance case before the Supreme Court may hinge on Vice President JD Vance's equivocation on running for president in 2028.

The case centers on efforts by Republican officials to lift limits on how much money political parties can spend in coordination with candidates.

The Supreme Court is considering a Republican-led drive, backed by President Donald Trump’s administration, to overturn a quarter-century-old decision and erase limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and president.

A lower federal appeals court ruled that the removal did not violate Constitutional protections against government censorship.

The justices let stand a lower court's decision allowing the removal of books including ones dealing with themes of race and LGBT identity, from its public library system.

The Supreme Court lets stand a ruling allowing a Texas county to remove 17 library books, rejecting a First Amendment challenge.

Betz is asking the state Supreme Court to intervene and order his release, saying Allen is “illegally confined.” The center has filed a similar motion, known as a writ of mandamus, for another re-arrested man, Jose Rafael Arellano-Sanchez.