The Court’s conservative majority has already signaled skepticism toward the FTC’s removal protections. Legal scholars say ...

The court’s conservative majority said that Texas’ asserted political motives justified letting the state use voting maps ...

A majority of the justices appeared supportive of arguments by a crisis pregnancy center that it should be able to challenge ...

The Court is poised to either restrain Trump’s power grabs or entrench them for years to come. And its rulings are ...

The Supreme Court appeared sympathetic to a group of faith-based pregnancy centers at oral arguments Tuesday in its fight ...

A less-recognized campaign finance case from 2010 paved the way for the super PACs frequently used by billionaires such as ...

The U.S. Supreme Court was set to hear arguments on a case questioning the extent to which Internet companies must police ...

The Supreme Court of India deliberates on unregulated AI use in courts, underscoring human judgment, training, and safeguards ...

The case was brought to the Supreme Court by the Trump administration, asking the justices for emergency relief.

Polls show Wisconsin prefers to elect justices, but the timing, term limits and vetting of candidates could be different.

The court has historically understood the perils of completely ignoring precedent and the will of the people. Chief Justice John Roberts is different.

The Trump administration on Friday urged the Supreme Court to step into a years-old legal battle over a policy that bars immigration judges from expressing their personal views in public, a case that ...